December 11, 2009
Another Case Where ICE Failed to Stop Illegal Immigration.

Just another case where ICE has failed.

Back in 2008, ICE officials, US Legal immigrants, and US citizens were brought before a House Judiciary Subcommittee  to challenge the detention and removal procedures. The committee found that ICE was in violation of many civil rights laws and forced to establish new regulations that protected the rights of immigrants and detainees. And yet, again, we have another case where an ICE official has plead guilty to corruption and aiding a Mexican drug cartel. And lets examine where this case took place, our good friend Arizona; who may just be the least immigrant friendly state along the border.

Katy Johnson

December 3, 2009
Court Rules that Mass Immigration Hearings is Unlawful

This post from the AP is pretty interesting. As a result of Project Steamline, no tolerance zones were set up along the border in Texas, Arizona and California. In these zones, immigrants who are caught have the chance of being tried in federal court.

However, because of the high volume of immigrants caught coming through these zones, many officials have turned to efficiency, reading the rights of these immigrants in groups rather than individually. And in some cases, the court tries the immigrants in groups, instead of individually.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that a federal court in Tucson, Ariz.,where mass hearings have been held for defendants arrested by U.S. Border Patrol agents, violates federal law which requires that each defendant be read their rights and be given an explanation of what a guilty plea means.

The problem with mass court hearings is that in the case of immigrants, many have no idea what they’re pleading guilty to or how to defend themselves.

-Katy Johnson

December 3, 2009
Immigration is Good for the Economy Followup

As a response to the article from Mitra regarding immigrants and the economy:

The study referred to in that article comes from The Fiscal Policy Institute. The nonpartisan research firm studied 25 metropolitan areas and found that immigrants contribute nearly 20% to the local GDP. By contrast, that makes up about 20% of the population. It is a 1:1 ratio. The taxes and profits made and paid by immigrants is directly related to immigrant population. In fact, most local municipalities are benefiting from immigrants.

The study was conducted to give policy makers a clear picture of how immigration truly effects our economy. But what I think is interesting is that this study has been a major focal point in newspapers and online news outlets all over the country.

And what caught my eye the most is this article in a Cincinnati online news site; “Immigrants Help Local Economy.” Why does this shock me? Because Cincinnati is one of the most conservative cities in America. It is like South Carolina, Texas, and Georgia all rolled into one. And they proudly admit the city is not very “immigrant friendly.” The first line of the article reads, “There may be debate over whether Greater Cincinnati is immigrant-friendly but a study released this week made one thing clear: foreign-born residents are good for Cincinnati’s economy.” The article continues to draw connections to immigration and a flourishing economy.

The FPI may have conducted research to influence policy makers, but it may have an effect on America’s view of immigration. For years immigration has been viewed negatively by American society. However, in times of economic hardship, perhaps articles like this one from Cincinatti and research from the FPI will help shed new light on the issue of immigration.

(It should be noted that while Cinci has not been hit as hard by the recession like it’s Democratic neighbor to the North, Cleveland; it has been severely effected by the current economy)

-Katy Johnson

December 2, 2009
Obama lifts ban on HIV+ immigration

while I am happy to see that President Obama lifted a ban on HIV+ persons entering (not even immigrating…entering) this country, it seems kind of ridiculous that this ban has even been in place since 1987…the year I was born. 22 years of this? Really?! Immigration Equality reports that the other countries with this travel restriction are: Armenai, Brunei, Moldova, Iraq, Qatar, Russia, South Korea, Oman, Sudan, and Saudi Arabia. That is definitely NOT a list we want to be on in terms of human rights. I personally did not know that such a ban existed, and I am disgusted to learn of it, and to learn how long it took for someone to fix this egregious rights violation.

Mitra

December 2, 2009
Study finds immigrants are a strong benefit to economy

In yet another article showing evidence in favor of the benefits of encouraging legal immigration into this country, a study has been published that shows that immigrants are amongst the hardest workers in the labor force. They seem to be very beneficial to the United States’ economy, in smaller cities as well as large. Also, there is data that suggests that the idea of immigrant workers posing a threat to native-born workers is false.

Mitra

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »